Skip to content
GitLab
Menu
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Sign in
Toggle navigation
Menu
Open sidebar
Marc Feger
Argument Relevance Presentation
Commits
e2890c64
Commit
e2890c64
authored
Aug 14, 2020
by
Jan Lukas Steimann
Browse files
Improve wording and readability and merge two frames
parent
c5b41447
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
slides/dataset.tex
View file @
e2890c64
...
@@ -9,16 +9,11 @@
...
@@ -9,16 +9,11 @@
Relevance
}
Relevance
}
\item
In this dataset Wachsmuth et al. constructed a ground-truth argument graph
\item
In this dataset Wachsmuth et al. constructed a ground-truth argument graph
as well as benchmark for argument ranking from this argument graph
as well as benchmark for argument ranking from this argument graph
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
Corpus
}
\begin{itemize}
\item
The data are originally collected from the Argument Web and stored in an
\item
The data are originally collected from the Argument Web and stored in an
argument graph
argument graph
\item
The Argument Web was the largest existing argument database with a
\item
The Argument Web was the largest existing argument database with a
structured argument corpora at that time
structured argument corpora at that time
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\end{frame}
...
@@ -49,13 +44,13 @@
...
@@ -49,13 +44,13 @@
\item
To create the benchmark dataset, Wachsmuth et al. only kept arguments
\item
To create the benchmark dataset, Wachsmuth et al. only kept arguments
from the graph that fulfill their requirements
from the graph that fulfill their requirements
\begin{itemize}
\begin{itemize}
\item
If a
conclusion
was
part in more than one argument
, it was kept
\item
A
conclusion
must be
part in more than one argument
\item
Furhtermore, Wachsmuth et al. removed all nodes that do not contain a
\item
Furhtermore, Wachsmuth et al. removed all nodes that do not contain a
real claim
real claim
\item
Additionally, an argument:
\item
Additionally, an argument:
\begin{itemize}
\begin{itemize}
\item
has to be a valid-counter argument
\item
has to be a valid-counter argument
\item
must be based on reasona
l
b premises
\item
must be based on reasonab
le
premises
\item
must allow a logic interference to be drawn
\item
must allow a logic interference to be drawn
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
...
@@ -79,15 +74,15 @@
...
@@ -79,15 +74,15 @@
\begin{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle
{
Evaluation Method
}
\frametitle
{
Evaluation Method
}
\begin{itemize}
\begin{itemize}
\item
To evaluate the agreement between the experts and to ensure comparability
\item
Wachsmuth et al. used Kendall's
$
\tau
$
to evaluate the agreement between
were than used Kendall's
$
\tau
$
the experts and to ensure comparability
\item
Kendall
$
\tau
$
is correlation coefficient that indicates the agreement
\item
Kendall
$
\tau
$
is
a
correlation coefficient that indicates the agreement
between two quantities with respect to a property
between two quantities with respect to a property
\begin{itemize}
\begin{itemize}
\item
In this case, this means the agreement between two experts with respect to
\item
In this case, this means the agreement between two experts with respect to
an argument
an argument
\item
-1 signifies a complete disagreement and +1 a complete agreement
\item
-1 signifies a complete disagreement and +1 a complete agreement
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\item
The mean over all experts for the evaluation of the benchmark is 0.36
\item
The mean over all experts for the evaluation of the benchmark is 0.36
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file
Write
Preview
Supports
Markdown
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment