Commit e2890c64 authored by Jan Lukas Steimann's avatar Jan Lukas Steimann
Browse files

Improve wording and readability and merge two frames

parent c5b41447
...@@ -9,16 +9,11 @@ ...@@ -9,16 +9,11 @@
Relevance} Relevance}
\item In this dataset Wachsmuth et al. constructed a ground-truth argument graph \item In this dataset Wachsmuth et al. constructed a ground-truth argument graph
as well as benchmark for argument ranking from this argument graph as well as benchmark for argument ranking from this argument graph
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Corpus}
\begin{itemize}
\item The data are originally collected from the Argument Web and stored in an \item The data are originally collected from the Argument Web and stored in an
argument graph argument graph
\item The Argument Web was the largest existing argument database with a \item The Argument Web was the largest existing argument database with a
structured argument corpora at that time structured argument corpora at that time
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
...@@ -49,13 +44,13 @@ ...@@ -49,13 +44,13 @@
\item To create the benchmark dataset, Wachsmuth et al. only kept arguments \item To create the benchmark dataset, Wachsmuth et al. only kept arguments
from the graph that fulfill their requirements from the graph that fulfill their requirements
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item If a conclusion was part in more than one argument, it was kept \item A conclusion must be part in more than one argument
\item Furhtermore, Wachsmuth et al. removed all nodes that do not contain a \item Furhtermore, Wachsmuth et al. removed all nodes that do not contain a
real claim real claim
\item Additionally, an argument: \item Additionally, an argument:
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item has to be a valid-counter argument \item has to be a valid-counter argument
\item must be based on reasonalb premises \item must be based on reasonable premises
\item must allow a logic interference to be drawn \item must allow a logic interference to be drawn
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
...@@ -79,15 +74,15 @@ ...@@ -79,15 +74,15 @@
\begin{frame} \begin{frame}
\frametitle{Evaluation Method} \frametitle{Evaluation Method}
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item To evaluate the agreement between the experts and to ensure comparability \item Wachsmuth et al. used Kendall's $\tau$ to evaluate the agreement between
were than used Kendall's $\tau$ the experts and to ensure comparability
\item Kendall $\tau$ is correlation coefficient that indicates the agreement \item Kendall $\tau$ is a correlation coefficient that indicates the agreement
between two quantities with respect to a property between two quantities with respect to a property
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item In this case, this means the agreement between two experts with respect to \item In this case, this means the agreement between two experts with respect to
an argument an argument
\item -1 signifies a complete disagreement and +1 a complete agreement \item -1 signifies a complete disagreement and +1 a complete agreement
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\item The mean over all experts for the evaluation of the benchmark is 0.36 \item The mean over all experts for the evaluation of the benchmark is 0.36
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment