Commit e2890c64 authored by Jan Lukas Steimann's avatar Jan Lukas Steimann
Browse files

Improve wording and readability and merge two frames

parent c5b41447
......@@ -9,16 +9,11 @@
Relevance}
\item In this dataset Wachsmuth et al. constructed a ground-truth argument graph
as well as benchmark for argument ranking from this argument graph
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Corpus}
\begin{itemize}
\item The data are originally collected from the Argument Web and stored in an
argument graph
\item The Argument Web was the largest existing argument database with a
structured argument corpora at that time
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
......@@ -49,13 +44,13 @@
\item To create the benchmark dataset, Wachsmuth et al. only kept arguments
from the graph that fulfill their requirements
\begin{itemize}
\item If a conclusion was part in more than one argument, it was kept
\item A conclusion must be part in more than one argument
\item Furhtermore, Wachsmuth et al. removed all nodes that do not contain a
real claim
\item Additionally, an argument:
\begin{itemize}
\item has to be a valid-counter argument
\item must be based on reasonalb premises
\item must be based on reasonable premises
\item must allow a logic interference to be drawn
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
......@@ -79,15 +74,15 @@
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Evaluation Method}
\begin{itemize}
\item To evaluate the agreement between the experts and to ensure comparability
were than used Kendall's $\tau$
\item Kendall $\tau$ is correlation coefficient that indicates the agreement
between two quantities with respect to a property
\begin{itemize}
\item In this case, this means the agreement between two experts with respect to
an argument
\item -1 signifies a complete disagreement and +1 a complete agreement
\end{itemize}
\item The mean over all experts for the evaluation of the benchmark is 0.36
\item Wachsmuth et al. used Kendall's $\tau$ to evaluate the agreement between
the experts and to ensure comparability
\item Kendall $\tau$ is a correlation coefficient that indicates the agreement
between two quantities with respect to a property
\begin{itemize}
\item In this case, this means the agreement between two experts with respect to
an argument
\item -1 signifies a complete disagreement and +1 a complete agreement
\end{itemize}
\item The mean over all experts for the evaluation of the benchmark is 0.36
\end{itemize}
\end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment