Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
V
Video Discussions Survey
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Jan Lukas Steimann
Video Discussions Survey
Commits
62c6484f
Commit
62c6484f
authored
4 years ago
by
Jan Lukas Steimann
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Add paper LeaveAComment
parent
ea7b06a6
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request
!19
Add paper LeaveAComment
Changes
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
Paper/LeaveAComment.md
+51
-0
51 additions, 0 deletions
Paper/LeaveAComment.md
with
51 additions
and
0 deletions
Paper/LeaveAComment.md
0 → 100644
+
51
−
0
View file @
62c6484f
# Zusammenfassung des Papers Leave a comment! A in-depth analysis of user comments on youtube
*
User Kommentare sind die häufigste und kontroverseste Form der Kommunikation auf YouTube
*
Dennoch werden jeden Tag werden große Mengen an Kommentaren gepostet
*
Die Autoren des Papers stellen eine Erklärung für diese Gegensatz vor basiernd auf einem neuen Klassifkationsansatz für Kommentare
## Introduction
*
Online videos are an object of social exchange
*
Authors conduct a survey on the perception of comments
*
Rather negative view on comments
*
The way comments are presented is substandard
*
Sequential list of comments sorted by creation date
*
Only first two or three comments can be viewed on orginal visiable space
*
=> Places one and two in comment section are privileged
## Research Model and Data Collection
*
First authors hat to find out how users communicate via comments
*
User comments are basically many unstructured text fragments
*
Authos focused on three basic comment types:
*
T1:
**Discussion Post**
contains comments which are part of a discussion among users
*
T2:
**Inferior Comment**
contains offensive statements and/or insults
*
T3:
**Substantial Comment**
Conatins comment without offensive statement that carry certain content information
*
Authors propose that T1 and T3 comments provide added value for users (Information, Entertainment, Social Exchange)
## Consistency Check: Is our Operationalization valid?
*
Authors examined distribution of comment classes in each video category
### Impications
*
Results indicate that no comment type is dominant on YouTube
*
user communicate on differnt video topics in different ways
*
Two comment types offer added value to user
*
Main reason for comments
*
Negative impressions come from comment type T2
## Comment Types and Rating - is there a relationship
*
Author analyse how comments relate to the dispersion of likes and dislikes
*
Two finding:
*
Number of T3 comments have the strongest effect on relative amount of likes
*
T2-comments have an influence on amount of dislikes
## Discussion
*
Analysis yield several recommendations for improving user acceptance of comments
*
Appropriate visualisation which take into context dependencies for particular video sequences into account could highlite valuable posts
*
Dynamic and media based annotations are likely to be very well suited for visualisation or context-specific user comments
*
A secondary rating system which user could use to express their emotional attitude
*
Short emotional posts would retain their significance if a more suitable visualisation form was available
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment