Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6c0419fa authored by Mario Surlemont's avatar Mario Surlemont
Browse files

Update todo.md

parent f0b20fae
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -47,8 +47,11 @@
- Refinde the concept how to test and which test results you want to include.
## literature
* Read _Imposing Connectivity Constraints in Forest Planning Models_.
* Read _Imposing Connectivity Constraints in Forest Planning Models_.
- Check for different constraints which could strengthen the formulation. (with focus on symmetry breaking)
- They did not mention a symmetry breaker *but* they mentioned some other types of inequalities which could strengthen the formulation according to the connectivity specification.
- A thing which was interesting that for their specific problems (which were not really close to MCDS and had only connectivity in common) they achived a much stronger LP bound.
- They added cuts before an ILP solution was found and added cuts for LP solutions also.
* Read _An Efficient Branch and Cut Algorithm to Find Frequently Mutated Subnetworks in Cancer_ again with focus on symmetry breaking.
* Read through _An Integer Programming Approach for Fault-Tolerant Connected Dominating Sets*_ again and check for symmetry breaking or other constraints to tighten up the space of solutions.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment