Refactor results

master.tex

@@ -179,8 +179,6 @@ Department for Computer-Networks and Communication-Systems}
 \input{slides/dataset}
 \input{slides/methods}
 \input{slides/results}
-\input{slides/conclusion}
-
 % % % % % % % % % Ende der eingefügten LaTeX-Dateien % % % % % % % % %
 \begin{frame}[allowframebreaks]\frametitle{References}
 	\bibliographystyle{plainnat}

slides/results.tex

 \section{Results}
 \begin{frame}
-	\begin{figure}
-		\frametitle{Evaluation of PageRank}
-		\centering
-		\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bilder/PageRankComparison.png}
-		\caption{Direct comparison of the different PageRank against the approach of \cite{wachsmuth:2017a}.}
-	\end{figure}
+	\frametitle{Results}
+	\textbf{PageRank performs best for $\alpha \approx 0$ indicating nearly no interconnection}
+
+	\begin{block}{First Result}
+		\begin{itemize}
+			\item PageRank is not satisfying yet
+			\item Reader not able to judge about interconnection
+		\end{itemize}
+	\end{block}
 \end{frame}
+
 \begin{frame}
-	\frametitle{Baseline Evaluation}
-	\begin{figure}
-		\centering
-		\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bilder/PairwiseResultComparison.png}
-		\caption{Direct comparison of all baseline values reported by \cite{wachsmuth:2017a} with all results obtained in this paper.}
-	  \end{figure}
+	\frametitle{Results}
+	\textbf{Simple content- and knowledge-based methods better then PageRank}
+	\begin{block}{Second Result}
+		\begin{itemize}
+			\item Relevance captured at word-level
+			\item Reader judges on context at word-level
+			\item Interconnection of secondary importance
+		\end{itemize}
+	\end{block}
 \end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file