Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
A
Argument Relevance Presentation
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Plan
Issues
Issue boards
Milestones
Wiki
Requirements
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Snippets
Locked files
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Test cases
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Package registry
Container registry
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Terraform modules
Monitor
Incidents
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Code review analytics
Issue analytics
Insights
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
GitLab community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Marc Feger
Argument Relevance Presentation
Commits
9e47f908
Commit
9e47f908
authored
4 years ago
by
Jan Lukas Steimann
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
Simplify sentences for dataset
parent
6d1de57f
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Pipeline
#44533
passed
4 years ago
Stage: test
Changes
1
Pipelines
1
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
slides/dataset.tex
+2
-2
2 additions, 2 deletions
slides/dataset.tex
with
2 additions
and
2 deletions
slides/dataset.tex
+
2
−
2
View file @
9e47f908
...
...
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
al.
\footnote
[1]
{
H. Wachsmuth, B. Stein, and Y. Ajjour "PageRank" for Argument
Relevance
}
\item
In this dataset Wachsmuth et al. constructed a ground-truth argument graph
as well as benchmark for argument ranking
from this argument graph
as well as benchmark for argument ranking
\item
The data are originally collected from the Argument Web and stored in an
argument graph
\item
The Argument Web was the largest existing argument database with a
...
...
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
from the graph that fulfill their requirements
\begin{itemize}
\item
A conclusion must be part in more than one argument
\item
Furhtermore, Wachsmuth et al. removed all nodes
that do not contain a
\item
All nodes are removed
that do not contain a
real claim
\item
Additionally, an argument:
\begin{itemize}
...
...
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment