Commit 2d0bec27 authored by Marc Feger's avatar Marc Feger
Browse files

Remove Result Table

parent bba885f2
Pipeline #44728 passed with stage
in 24 seconds
......@@ -14,44 +14,4 @@
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bilder/PairwiseResultComparison.png}
\caption{Direct comparison of all baseline values reported by \cite{wachsmuth:2017a} with all results obtained in this paper.}
\end{figure}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Detailed Results}
\begin{table}[hbp!]
\centering
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{llrrrcrrrcrrrcrrrcrrr}
\toprule
\multirow{3}{*}{\textbf{\#}} &
\multirow{3}{*}{\textbf{Approach}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(a) Minimum}}& &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(b) Average}} & &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(c) Maximum}} & &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(d) Sum}} & &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(e) Best results}} \\
\cline{3-5} \cline{7-9} \cline{11-13} \cline{15-17} \cline{19-21} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst}\\
\midrule
\small 1 & PageRank & 0.01 & 8 & 6 & & 0.02 & 9 & 7 & & 0.11 & 8 & 6 & & 0.28 & 11 & 5 & & 0.28 & 11 & 5 \\
\small 2 & Frequency & -0.10 & 2 & 8 & & -0.03 & 3 & 9 & & -0.01 & 2 & 8 & & 0.10 & 6 & 8 & & 0.10 & 6 & 8 \\
\small 3 & Similarity & -0.13 & 4 & 11 & & -0.05 & 5 & 11 & & 0.01 & 6 & 10 & & 0.02 & 6 & 10 & & 0.02 & 6 & 10 \\
\small 4 & Sentiment & 0.01 & 6 & 7 & & 0.11 & 9 & 4 & & 0.12 & 6 & 4 & & 0.12 & 9 & 4 & & 0.12 & 9 & 4 \\
\small 5 & Most premises & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & 0.19 & 3 & 3 & & 0.19 & 3 & 3 \\
\small 6 & Random & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & 0.00 & 5 & 7 & & 0.00 & 5 & 7 \\
\midrule
\small 7 & SNN & 0.12 & 10 & 6 & & 0.24 & 11 & 5 & & 0.31 & 12 & 5 & & 0.30 & 13 & 5 & & 0.31 & 13 & 5 \\
\small 8 & GWP & \textbf{0.22} & 12 & 5 & & \textbf{0.28} & 13 & \textbf{3} & & \textbf{0.39} & \textbf{14} & \textbf{2} & & \textbf{0.47} & \textbf{16} & \textbf{1} & & \textbf{0.47} & \textbf{16} & \textbf{1} \\
\small 9 & GWOP & -0.06 & 5 & 9 & & 0.00 & 6 & 7 & & 0.14 & 8 & 6 & & 0.20 & 8 & 4 & & 0.20 & 8 & 4 \\
\small 10 & EWP & 0.03 & 6 & 9 & & 0.08 & 7 & 8 & & 0.11 & 8 & 8 & & 0.28 & 9 & 5 & & 0.28 & 9 & 5 \\
\small 11 & EWOP & -0.04 & 5 & 9 & & 0.03 & 6 & 8 & & 0.07 & 7 & 8 & & 0.23 & 9 & 6 & & 0.23 & 9 & 6 \\
\small 12 & BWP & -0.09 & 6 & 9 & & -0.02 & 7 & 8 & & 0.05 & 9 & 8 & & 0.24 & 10 & 5 & & 0.24 & 10 & 5 \\
\small 13 & BWOP & -0.06 & 6 & 9 & & -0.01 & 7 & 8 & & 0.07 & 9 & 8 & & 0.26 & 10 & 5 & & 0.26 & 10 & 5 \\
\small 14 & MKBM & 0.10 & 5 & 7 & & 0.08 & 13 & 6 & & 0.24 & 12 & 8 & & 0.34 & 11 & 9 & & 0.34 & 13 & 6 \\
\small 15 & AKBM & 0.15 & \textbf{14} & \textbf{4} & & 0.26 & \textbf{14} & 4 & & 0.38 & 11 & 7 & & 0.40 & 13 & 7 & & 0.40 & 14 & 4 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
}
\vspace*{0mm}
\caption{Comparison of the approaches of \cite{wachsmuth:2017a} (1-6) with those used in this study (7-15). For each aggregation (a-d) the average agreement $\tau$ and the cases in which the respective approach performed best or worst over the 32 conclusions of the 110 arguments are given. (e) shows the best results of an aggregation.}
\label{tab:results}
\end{table}
\end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment