Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 2d0bec27 authored by Marc Feger's avatar Marc Feger
Browse files

Remove Result Table

parent bba885f2
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Checking pipeline status
Show whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
Showing
with 0 additions and 40 deletions
slides/results.tex
+ 0
− 40
View file @ 2d0bec27
...@@ -15,43 +15,3 @@ ...@@ -15,43 +15,3 @@
\caption{Direct comparison of all baseline values reported by \cite{wachsmuth:2017a} with all results obtained in this paper.} \caption{Direct comparison of all baseline values reported by \cite{wachsmuth:2017a} with all results obtained in this paper.}
\end{figure} \end{figure}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Detailed Results}
\begin{table}[hbp!]
\centering
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{llrrrcrrrcrrrcrrrcrrr}
\toprule
\multirow{3}{*}{\textbf{\#}} &
\multirow{3}{*}{\textbf{Approach}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(a) Minimum}}& &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(b) Average}} & &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(c) Maximum}} & &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(d) Sum}} & &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\textbf{(e) Best results}} \\
\cline{3-5} \cline{7-9} \cline{11-13} \cline{15-17} \cline{19-21} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst} & & $\tau$ & \textit{best} & \textit{worst}\\
\midrule
\small 1 & PageRank & 0.01 & 8 & 6 & & 0.02 & 9 & 7 & & 0.11 & 8 & 6 & & 0.28 & 11 & 5 & & 0.28 & 11 & 5 \\
\small 2 & Frequency & -0.10 & 2 & 8 & & -0.03 & 3 & 9 & & -0.01 & 2 & 8 & & 0.10 & 6 & 8 & & 0.10 & 6 & 8 \\
\small 3 & Similarity & -0.13 & 4 & 11 & & -0.05 & 5 & 11 & & 0.01 & 6 & 10 & & 0.02 & 6 & 10 & & 0.02 & 6 & 10 \\
\small 4 & Sentiment & 0.01 & 6 & 7 & & 0.11 & 9 & 4 & & 0.12 & 6 & 4 & & 0.12 & 9 & 4 & & 0.12 & 9 & 4 \\
\small 5 & Most premises & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & 0.19 & 3 & 3 & & 0.19 & 3 & 3 \\
\small 6 & Random & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & n/a & n/a & n/a & & 0.00 & 5 & 7 & & 0.00 & 5 & 7 \\
\midrule
\small 7 & SNN & 0.12 & 10 & 6 & & 0.24 & 11 & 5 & & 0.31 & 12 & 5 & & 0.30 & 13 & 5 & & 0.31 & 13 & 5 \\
\small 8 & GWP & \textbf{0.22} & 12 & 5 & & \textbf{0.28} & 13 & \textbf{3} & & \textbf{0.39} & \textbf{14} & \textbf{2} & & \textbf{0.47} & \textbf{16} & \textbf{1} & & \textbf{0.47} & \textbf{16} & \textbf{1} \\
\small 9 & GWOP & -0.06 & 5 & 9 & & 0.00 & 6 & 7 & & 0.14 & 8 & 6 & & 0.20 & 8 & 4 & & 0.20 & 8 & 4 \\
\small 10 & EWP & 0.03 & 6 & 9 & & 0.08 & 7 & 8 & & 0.11 & 8 & 8 & & 0.28 & 9 & 5 & & 0.28 & 9 & 5 \\
\small 11 & EWOP & -0.04 & 5 & 9 & & 0.03 & 6 & 8 & & 0.07 & 7 & 8 & & 0.23 & 9 & 6 & & 0.23 & 9 & 6 \\
\small 12 & BWP & -0.09 & 6 & 9 & & -0.02 & 7 & 8 & & 0.05 & 9 & 8 & & 0.24 & 10 & 5 & & 0.24 & 10 & 5 \\
\small 13 & BWOP & -0.06 & 6 & 9 & & -0.01 & 7 & 8 & & 0.07 & 9 & 8 & & 0.26 & 10 & 5 & & 0.26 & 10 & 5 \\
\small 14 & MKBM & 0.10 & 5 & 7 & & 0.08 & 13 & 6 & & 0.24 & 12 & 8 & & 0.34 & 11 & 9 & & 0.34 & 13 & 6 \\
\small 15 & AKBM & 0.15 & \textbf{14} & \textbf{4} & & 0.26 & \textbf{14} & 4 & & 0.38 & 11 & 7 & & 0.40 & 13 & 7 & & 0.40 & 14 & 4 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
}
\vspace*{0mm}
\caption{Comparison of the approaches of \cite{wachsmuth:2017a} (1-6) with those used in this study (7-15). For each aggregation (a-d) the average agreement $\tau$ and the cases in which the respective approach performed best or worst over the 32 conclusions of the 110 arguments are given. (e) shows the best results of an aggregation.}
\label{tab:results}
\end{table}
\end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment