Refactor introduction.tex

slides/introduction.tex

@@ -5,11 +5,6 @@
 	\begin{columns}
 		\column{0.7\textwidth}
 			\textbf{\emph{What would you like to search for? \\What would you like to know?}}
-			\begin{itemize}
-				\item The web is full of data, including discussions and arguments
-				\item Conventional web searches sort results in order of relevance
-				\item Future search engines should be able to provide searches for arguments
-			\end{itemize}
 		\column{0.3\textwidth}
 			\includegraphics[scale=0.08]{bilder/pngfuel-question.png}
 		\end{columns}
@@ -18,10 +13,10 @@
 	\frametitle{Motivation}
 	\begin{description}[leftmargin=0pt]
 		\item[Question:] \textbf{\emph{Why should peanuts be banned on board aircraft?}}
-		\item[($a_1$):] \emph{Peanut reactions can be life threatening. An individual doesn't have to consume the product to have a life threatening reaction. They can have contact or inhalation reactions.}
-		\item[($a_2$):] \emph{Providing buffer zones to avoid contact with peanuts is a thoughtful gesture. But from a practical point of view, it does not work.}
-		\item[($a_3$):] \emph{With so many food choices available, why are peanuts a necessary choice?}
-		\item[($a_4$):] \emph{Restricting the ban of peanut products to certain flights is not enough.}		
+		\item[($a_1$):] \emph{Peanut reactions can be \textbf{life threatening}. An individual \textbf{doesn't have to consume} the product to have a life threatening reaction. They can have \textbf{contact or inhalation reactions.}}
+		\item[($a_2$):] \emph{Providing \textbf{buffer zones} to avoid contact with peanuts is a \textbf{thoughtful gesture}. But from a practical point of view, it does not work.}
+		\item[($a_3$):] \emph{With so \textbf{many food choices} available, \textbf{why are peanuts a necessary choice?}}
+		\item[($a_4$):] \emph{\textbf{Restricting} the ban of peanut products to certain flights is \textbf{not enough}.}		
 	\end{description}
 	\begin{block}{Possible ranking}
 		$a_1 > a_2 \geq a_3 > a_4$?
@@ -32,16 +27,17 @@
 	\frametitle{About this work}
 	\textbf{This paper covers the following topics:}
 	\begin{itemize}
-		\item Follow-up to the work of \cite{wachsmuth:2017a}
+		\item Follow-up of \cite{wachsmuth:2017a}
 		\item Evaluation of methods for determining relevant arguments
 			\begin{itemize}
-				\item Detailed analysis of PageRank for argument relevance
-				\item Intuitive content- and knowledge-based methods from the area of NLP
+				\item Analysis of PageRank
+				\item Intuitive content- and knowledge-based methods
 			\end{itemize}
 	\end{itemize}
-	\begin{block}{In total}
-		We show how PageRank is not entirely sufficient to evaluate the relevance arguments.
-
-		Furthermore, we could show how the content- and knowledge-based methods performed significantly better.
+	\begin{block}{Results}
+		\begin{itemize}
+			\item PageRank is not entirely sufficient
+			\item Better results with content- and knowledge-based methods
+		\end{itemize}
 	\end{block}
 \end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file