Commit 06a826e3 authored by Marc Feger's avatar Marc Feger
Browse files

Refactor introduction.tex

parent 5b6d434d
Pipeline #45902 passed with stage
in 30 seconds
...@@ -5,11 +5,6 @@ ...@@ -5,11 +5,6 @@
\begin{columns} \begin{columns}
\column{0.7\textwidth} \column{0.7\textwidth}
\textbf{\emph{What would you like to search for? \\What would you like to know?}} \textbf{\emph{What would you like to search for? \\What would you like to know?}}
\begin{itemize}
\item The web is full of data, including discussions and arguments
\item Conventional web searches sort results in order of relevance
\item Future search engines should be able to provide searches for arguments
\end{itemize}
\column{0.3\textwidth} \column{0.3\textwidth}
\includegraphics[scale=0.08]{bilder/pngfuel-question.png} \includegraphics[scale=0.08]{bilder/pngfuel-question.png}
\end{columns} \end{columns}
...@@ -18,10 +13,10 @@ ...@@ -18,10 +13,10 @@
\frametitle{Motivation} \frametitle{Motivation}
\begin{description}[leftmargin=0pt] \begin{description}[leftmargin=0pt]
\item[Question:] \textbf{\emph{Why should peanuts be banned on board aircraft?}} \item[Question:] \textbf{\emph{Why should peanuts be banned on board aircraft?}}
\item[($a_1$):] \emph{Peanut reactions can be life threatening. An individual doesn't have to consume the product to have a life threatening reaction. They can have contact or inhalation reactions.} \item[($a_1$):] \emph{Peanut reactions can be \textbf{life threatening}. An individual \textbf{doesn't have to consume} the product to have a life threatening reaction. They can have \textbf{contact or inhalation reactions.}}
\item[($a_2$):] \emph{Providing buffer zones to avoid contact with peanuts is a thoughtful gesture. But from a practical point of view, it does not work.} \item[($a_2$):] \emph{Providing \textbf{buffer zones} to avoid contact with peanuts is a \textbf{thoughtful gesture}. But from a practical point of view, it does not work.}
\item[($a_3$):] \emph{With so many food choices available, why are peanuts a necessary choice?} \item[($a_3$):] \emph{With so \textbf{many food choices} available, \textbf{why are peanuts a necessary choice?}}
\item[($a_4$):] \emph{Restricting the ban of peanut products to certain flights is not enough.} \item[($a_4$):] \emph{\textbf{Restricting} the ban of peanut products to certain flights is \textbf{not enough}.}
\end{description} \end{description}
\begin{block}{Possible ranking} \begin{block}{Possible ranking}
$a_1 > a_2 \geq a_3 > a_4$? $a_1 > a_2 \geq a_3 > a_4$?
...@@ -32,16 +27,17 @@ ...@@ -32,16 +27,17 @@
\frametitle{About this work} \frametitle{About this work}
\textbf{This paper covers the following topics:} \textbf{This paper covers the following topics:}
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item Follow-up to the work of \cite{wachsmuth:2017a} \item Follow-up of \cite{wachsmuth:2017a}
\item Evaluation of methods for determining relevant arguments \item Evaluation of methods for determining relevant arguments
\begin{itemize} \begin{itemize}
\item Detailed analysis of PageRank for argument relevance \item Analysis of PageRank
\item Intuitive content- and knowledge-based methods from the area of NLP \item Intuitive content- and knowledge-based methods
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\end{itemize} \end{itemize}
\begin{block}{In total} \begin{block}{Results}
We show how PageRank is not entirely sufficient to evaluate the relevance arguments. \begin{itemize}
\item PageRank is not entirely sufficient
Furthermore, we could show how the content- and knowledge-based methods performed significantly better. \item Better results with content- and knowledge-based methods
\end{itemize}
\end{block} \end{block}
\end{frame} \end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment