From 3b39e2f5a3332d3e8f873ee78c2a2778a9ec4979 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: msurl <masur101@hhu.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:26:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] added todo list

---
 journal/todo.md | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 journal/todo.md

diff --git a/journal/todo.md b/journal/todo.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c6aeda3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/journal/todo.md
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Week 4
+## Python
+### implementation
+* Refactor code. 
+	- Fix bug with separators.
+	- Add option to cli to select which type of inequalities to be included. 
+* Implement different type of constraints. 
+	- _Solving the Maximum-Weight Connected Subgraph Problem to Optimality_
+	- _Solving the Connected Dominating Set Problem and Power Dominating Set Problem by Integer Programming
+
+### runtime
+* Do tests according to test concept and store data in some sort of strucured format(CSV/ XML/ JSON) which could be included in python or R.  
+
+## thesis
+* Begin paragraph about results and add preliminary results and observations. 
+	- Create a concept how to test and which test results you want to include. 
+
+## literature
+* Read _Imposing Connectivity Constraints in Forest Planning Models_.
+	- Check for different constraints which could strengthen the formulation.
+* Read _Solving the Connected Dominating Set Problem and Power Dominating Set Problem by Integer Programming_
+	- Different constraints to induce connectivity are compared. Try to implement some of them to compare them and see which one is best. You may see if this is related to a charateristic of your graphs. As the literature may states that for some type of graphs some approaches are better. 
+* Check _On imposing connectivity constraints in integer programs_ again to see if there is some other literature which you are missing. 
+
+
+
+# Backlog
+## Python 
+### Implementation 
+* Remove lp_to_graph from package and instead use some other format to store graphs and use them as input.
-- 
GitLab