From 96b9a3318493528c9b4cab5671f09ca0b8a82ac0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: feger <marc.feger@uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 13:04:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add conclusion
---
slides/conclusion.tex | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/slides/conclusion.tex b/slides/conclusion.tex
index f38c6cd..29d7f3c 100644
--- a/slides/conclusion.tex
+++ b/slides/conclusion.tex
@@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
\section{Conclusion}
-\subsection{Conclusion}
\begin{frame}
- I am better then you!
+ \frametitle{Conclusion}
+ \textbf{PageRank performs best for $\alpha \approx 0$ indicating nearly no interconnection}
+
+ \begin{block}{First Result}
+ PageRank is not satisfying the recognition of argument relevance yet.
+
+ A reader might not be able to judge about a deep context in form of interconnected arguments.
+ \end{block}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}
+ \frametitle{Conclusion}
+ \textbf{Simple content- and knowledge-based methods capture the readers awareness better then PageRank}
+ \begin{block}{Second Result}
+ The relevance of arguments can be captured at word-level.
+
+ The reader is guided more by the context, which results from the words in the argument.
+
+ Of secondary importance is the connection between the arguments.
+ \end{block}
\end{frame}
\ No newline at end of file
--
GitLab